ALIEN CONTACTField archive / abduction dossier
Independent field archive / expanded dossier · Case file 03

The Pascagoula River encounter.

Hickson and Parker’s 1973 report

00 / The briefing

Case summary.

Two shipyard workers, Charles Hickson and Calvin Parker, said they were fishing beside the Pascagoula River when a strange craft appeared and three unusual beings carried them aboard. Their immediate report to police and a secretly recorded conversation helped make this one of the most discussed American abduction cases.

Reported: 11 October 1973Location: Pascagoula, Mississippi, United StatesReport type: Two-witness report; police recording

Unverified claim

Editorial note. This dossier records what has been reported and how the case entered UFO literature. It does not present the alleged abduction as established fact. Details may differ between early interviews and later retellings; the source trail should be checked before drawing conclusions.
01 / The account

What was reported.

  1. A quiet evening becomes an encounterHickson, 42, and Parker, 19, said they were fishing from a riverside pier after work when they heard a buzzing or whirring sound and saw a bright oval object nearby. They described the craft as hovering above the ground or water, with lights and a blue-grey appearance. The men said they were frightened and unable to leave as three figures emerged.
  2. The figures describedTheir descriptions differed from the small, large-eyed beings associated with later Grey imagery. The figures were described as roughly human-sized or larger, with pale or wrinkled skin, pointed features, and unusual appendages. Hickson said the beings lifted him and Parker and carried them into the object. The descriptions are drawn from their testimony and differ in wording across accounts.
  3. Inside the objectHickson said he was held in a room and examined by a floating, eye-like device that moved over his body. Parker later said he was terrified and had limited memory of the interior. The men reported being returned to the pier after a short interval. They said they were not physically harmed, although Parker was deeply distressed by the experience.
  4. Police interview and recorded conversationThe pair went to the local sheriff’s office shortly after the event. Officers interviewed them separately and, according to later accounts, left them in a room with a recording device. The recording is frequently cited by supporters because the men appear to continue discussing the event when they believe they are alone. It documents their conversation and distress, but it cannot by itself establish what caused the experience.
  5. Investigators, sceptics and later statementsThe case attracted local and national attention, and the men were interviewed by UFO investigators. Supporters argue that the prompt report and the men’s demeanour make deliberate fabrication unlikely. Skeptical assessments note that sincerity does not rule out misperception, stress, confusion, or an unknown ordinary stimulus; there is no publicly conclusive physical evidence of a craft or beings. Parker spoke less publicly for many years before later revisiting the story.
02 / Evidence review

What the record can support.

The police contact and reported testimony are part of the historical record. The alleged abduction remains an unverified interpretation; the recording demonstrates the men discussing their experience, not the extraterrestrial cause of it.

QuestionCurrent assessment
Is there a known report or published account?Yes. The story has been discussed in UFO literature and the sources listed below provide starting points for tracing it.
Are the alleged beings or craft independently confirmed?No conclusive public evidence establishes the extraterrestrial interpretation.
Are memory or testimony limitations relevant?Yes. As applicable to this case, retrospective accounts, hypnosis, disputed images, or incomplete independent corroboration require caution.
Best current labelHistorical allegation; unresolved and unverified.
Research checklist. Compare the earliest available account with later versions; record who first reported each detail; look for independent witnesses interviewed separately; check original rather than reproduced photographs; and distinguish an unexplained observation from an explanation attached to it.
03 / Further reading

Follow the source trail.

These links are research starting points, not endorsements of every claim they contain. Some are secondary summaries or case indexes. Where possible, seek original interviews, contemporaneous documents, and independent analysis.

← Return to all abduction accounts Area 51 expanded dossier ↗